Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

New York Times pushes public financing for the sake of sanity

With the stratospheric costs of the 2008 election already apparent--$1 billion for the presidential candidates, more for congressional races, $300 per Iowa caucus-goer--the New York Times takes those numbers, stirs in a bit of common sense and democratic principle, and comes out with a steaming cup of presidential public financing.
A worthy bill to restore public financing's relevancy is scheduled to be introduced this week. It is solidly bipartisan and bicameral, sponsored by Senators Russ Feingold and Susan Collins and Representatives Christopher Shays and David Price. The subsidy and spending formulas would be repaired to allow candidates to be competitive without plunging into the money maelstrom.
This bill, slated to be introduced tomorrow, covers only the presidential races.  Of course, the Fair Elections Now Act covers congressional races, which the Times editorial omits.  But in looking at the presidential race and election law in general, the editorial board casts a critical eye on the FEC and the presidential candidates themselves--read more on the flip.

Even if the Supreme Court has started treating the cash of wealthy corporations and special-interest groups as free speech, there are responsible ways to put brakes on a runaway money train that promises to generate little in the way of voter turnout or issue elucidation.

The Federal Election Commission, normally weighted with machine loyalists from the two parties, has to become more of an enforcer of the law than an enabler of law-evaders. It must crack down harder on such blatant abusers as the noxious "527 committees" of 2004 that tapped illegal fat-cat donations to pass off bare-knuckle partisan operations as tax-exempt initiatives.

The commission did finally penalize prominent malefactors like the Republicans' Swift boat attackers and the Democrats' anti-Bush drive, called America Coming Together. But this came almost four years after initial complaints -- and the fines amount to just 1 or 2 cents per dollar for the hundreds of millions spent illegally by these shadow-party operatives. Treating subverters of fair elections as political jaywalkers can only encourage a fresh round of schemers next year. The commission needs to issue a broadside warning right now that its penalties will be far steeper and more timely and will target principals, not just their umbrella groups.
And as for the presidential candidates themselves:
The measure would take effect in 2012, so there's no good reason why the current array of presidential candidates -- some of them already burned by tainted fat-cat donors -- should not join Senator Barack Obama in endorsing this step back toward campaign sanity.
The Times misses the fact that John Edwards, in his democracy policy proposal, also endorsed a renewed Presidential public financing system, but otherwise the point is well taken.


Tags: new york times, public financing, election 08 (all tags)


Display:

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy