Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Edwards unveils democracy agenda

John Edwards announced several key policy positions on democracy over the weekend, including a commitment to pass and enact full public financing of congressional campaigns. His language left no doubt about where he places much of the blame for the lapses in our system: wealthy campaign donors, Washington lobbyists, and special interests.

I'm excited about this because Edwards' announcement, framed as a new "One Democracy" initiative, represents the deepest and most specific set of promises made by any of the front-running candidates in either party during this campaign. He commits to passage of several top Common Cause priorities, including "Clean Elections"-style public financing for Congress, based on the successful models of Maine and Arizona. He also covers key pieces of election reform--voter-verified paper ballots, election-day registration, and DC voting rights--and pledges to protect net neutrality.

Good for Edwards. The troubling evolution of our democracy into a wealth-dominated system that puts powerful special interests and high-dollar donors ahead of average Americans is something that most citizens know well, and most candidates witness firsthand. If they wonder why voter apathy persists and why "politician" remains a dirty word, they should look no further than the private financing system that breeds voter distrust and corruption. Yet we often hear little more than vague rhetoric from candidates about how they'll solve this core, systemic problem. Public financing of campaigns is critical and they should say so.

And good for Common Cause. No doubt many factors played into Edwards' decision to go public with such a bold democracy agenda. I assume we were one of them, because we've been recruiting and coordinating a team of voters and activists in Iowa who are passionate about public financing reform and have been at events around the state asking Edwards--and any other candidates they can--about his support and commitment.

Other candidates have spoken in favor of public financing and supported public financing legislation--we'll be putting more information about specific statements up here soon--but none have gone to this length or made their commitment so clear.

Here's a bit more detail:
Reform Campaign Finance To Strengthen Small Donors

The system for financing American elections is rigged to amplify the influence of powerful and wealthy individuals as both donors and candidates. Facing increasingly expensive campaigns, politicians have become dependent on wealthy supporters. Even while governing, they must raise thousands of dollars a day. The average cost of successful congressional races has doubled since 1990 to $1 million for House races and $8 million for Senate races. The best-financed candidates won in over 90 percent of races in 2004. [CRP, 2004 and 2007]

John Edwards believes that the first step toward getting the policies we want is to put regular people back in charge of Washington. As president, he will

Reform Presidential Campaign Finance Laws to Empower Small Donors: Analysts believe that we are on track to spend a $1 billion on the 2008 presidential election. Few top-tier presidential candidates accept public financing, and candidates rely on wealthy, well-connected "bundlers" to help them raise tens of millions of dollars. The Internet has enabled a boom in small donations from regular people, but wealthy donors and bundlers still supplied nearly 80 percent of dollars contributed to candidates in the first quarter of 2007. Edwards will create a new Grassroots Presidential Financing System to empower regular Americans in a potentially universal public financing system. It will match small donations under $100 by eight to one, making two $100 donations as valuable to a campaign as a single $1,000 donation. (Each $100 donation would receive an $800 match, making them worth $900 each. The $1,000 donation would also receive an $800 match and be worth $1,800.) Edwards will also reduce the maximum contribution from $2,300 to $1,000 per person to better reflect the incomes of most Americans and update the campaign spending limits to attract all candidates into the system. [N.Y. Times, 1/23/07; CFI, 2007]

Provide Full Public Financing in Congressional Campaigns: There is no public financing for congressional races, favoring candidates who are incumbents, have personal wealth, or have strong support from the wealthy and their corporate interests. Edwards will create full public financing for House and Senate races. Candidates who raise a certain number of $5 contributions will receive equal public financing and air time, while additional "fair fight" funds will help candidates facing self-financed campaigns and independent expenditures. States with these models—like Maine and Arizona—have reported more political accountability and candidates from more diverse backgrounds. [Brennan Center et al, 2007]


Tags: John Edwards, public financing, election 08, clean elections, money in politics (all tags)


Display:

Yalies for Reform

Peter Levine, a former Common Cause staff and, like our own Josh, a graduate of Yale, writing about Edwards' reform proposals -- http://www.peterlevine.ws/mt/

by Ed Davis on Tue Oct 16, 2007 at 09:30:42 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy